home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1994
/
july94.doc
/
000334_owner-lightwave-l _Wed Jul 20 15:52:17 1994.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-03-23
|
2KB
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave-l>
Received: by mail.netcom.com (8.6.8.1/Netcom) id HAA15883; Wed, 20 Jul 1994 07:41:47 -0700
Received: from westford.ccur.com by mail.netcom.com (8.6.8.1/Netcom) id HAA15869; Wed, 20 Jul 1994 07:41:41 -0700
Received: from hubbub by masscomp.westford.ccur.com via TCP/IP with SMTP id aa11078; 20 Jul 94 10:37 EDT
Received: from toaster by hubbub.westford.ccur.com via TCP/IP with SMTP (local) id aa02803; 20 Jul 94 10:38 EDT
To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
Subject: Re: Field Rendering.
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 19 Jul 94 22:45:23 -0700. <Pine.3.89.9407192237.A20770-0100000@netcom14>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 94 10:38:54 EDT
From: Mark Thompson <mark@westford.ccur.com>
Message-ID: <9407201038.aa02803@hubbub.westford.ccur.com>
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
John Gross <jgross@netcom.com> writes:
> Actually, we render frames and use motion blur as that gives us more of a
> film quality look. 60 fields per sec looks great, but looks like video...
> I'm not sure what B5 does, but I believe its the same.
I was inspecting some B5 footage the other day and it appeared that they used
both field rendering and motion blur depending on the scene. Wherever the
motion was particularly fast, motion blur was used. Less demanding shots
used field rendering.
%~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~%
% ` ' Mark Thompson CONCURRENT COMPUTER %
% --==* RADIANT *==-- mark@westford.ccur.com Principal Graphics %
% ' Image ` ...!uunet!masscomp!mark Hardware Architect %
% Productions (508)392-2480 (603)424-1829 & General Nuisance %
% %
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~